{"id":2143,"date":"2019-05-15T21:08:20","date_gmt":"2019-05-16T01:08:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/?p=2143"},"modified":"2019-05-17T21:43:47","modified_gmt":"2019-05-18T01:43:47","slug":"is-trumps-trade-war-saving-american-jobs-or-killing-them","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/2019\/05\/15\/is-trumps-trade-war-saving-american-jobs-or-killing-them\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Trump\u2019s trade war saving American jobs \u2013 or killing them?"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure>\n<p><div style=\"width: 764px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/274728\/original\/file-20190515-60567-14cvxlp.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\" alt=\"File 20190515 60567 14cvxlp.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1\" width=\"754\" height=\"488\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Trump administration says its trade policy saved the U.S. steel industry. AP Photo\/Jim Mone<\/p><\/div><figcaption><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/jeffrey-kucik-279724\">Jeffrey Kucik | May 15, 2015<\/a><\/p>\n<p>With the U.S.-China trade war <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/05\/13\/us\/politics\/us-china-trade-tariffs.html\">intensifying<\/a>, there is a lot of talk about whether tariffs save American jobs \u2013 as President Donald Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/09\/17\/us\/politics\/trump-tariffs-american-factories.html\">claims<\/a> \u2013 or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/stuartanderson\/2018\/09\/24\/tariffs-are-costing-jobs-a-look-at-how-many\/#6e6f2e3d7b26\">destroy them<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>On May 14, for example, Trump said his tariffs <a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/homenews\/administration\/443523-trump-credits-tariffs-for-rebuilding-us-steel-industry\">helped save<\/a> the U.S. steel industry. Whether or not that\u2019s true, many economists and industry organizations argue trade protectionism is actually hurting workers in a range of other areas, such as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/jamesellsmoor\/2019\/02\/24\/under-trumps-tariffs-the-us-lost-20000-solar-energy-jobs\/\">solar power sector<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2019\/05\/13\/boeing-shares-fall-on-speculation-that-china-may-single-it-out-in-the-trade-war.html\">civil aircraft<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.freep.com\/story\/money\/cars\/mark-phelan\/2019\/02\/18\/tariffs-trump-steel-aluminum-nada\/2885080002\/\">auto manufacturing<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So is the trade war making Americans better off or worse? Political economists <a href=\"https:\/\/sgpp.arizona.edu\/user\/jeff-kucik\">like me<\/a> have been exploring this question since Trump\u2019s trade war began about a year ago. The answer makes a big difference to the economic welfare of American workers. And, with the 2020 elections soon approaching, it may help determine whether Trump is able to remain in the Oval Office.<\/p>\n<h2>The winners<\/h2>\n<p>At first glance, the jobs data does look good for Trump\u2019s argument.<\/p>\n<p>Since Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/piie.com\/blogs\/trade-investment-policy-watch\/trump-trade-war-china-date-guide\">announced tariffs<\/a> on more than 1,000 Chinese products on April 3, 2018, about <a href=\"https:\/\/data.bls.gov\/timeseries\/ces0000000001?output_view=net_1mth\">2.6 million new jobs<\/a> have been added to the U.S. economy.<\/p>\n<p>This includes <a href=\"https:\/\/data.bls.gov\/timeseries\/CES3000000001\">204,000 jobs in manufacturing<\/a>, the sector of the economy that hemorrhaged over 5 million positions from 2000 to 2009, a problem blamed on <a href=\"https:\/\/ourfuture.org\/20150309\/how-our-trade-policies-kill-jobs\">free trade<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2016\/04\/18\/474393701\/china-killed-1-million-u-s-jobs-but-don-t-blame-trade-deals\">China<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The good news for Trump doesn\u2019t stop there. Some of the biggest gainers over the last year are industries like fabricated metals, machinery and electronic instruments, all of which saw gains of 15,000 to almost 30,000 jobs over the past year. All those industries enjoy at least some protection from Trump\u2019s tariffs.<\/p>\n<p>Those numbers seem to support Trump\u2019s rhetoric that tariffs are providing a vital shot in the arm of America\u2019s ailing manufacturing sector. And they may even show why the U.S. economy continues to hum despite <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/us-china-trade-war-recession-economy-bank-america-1421994\">economist fears<\/a> that a trade war would <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2019\/05\/15\/latest-data-show-surprise-slowing-in-us-china-economies-as-trade-war-escalates.html\">hurt growth<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>The losers<\/h2>\n<p>Unfortunately, not all industries are enjoying the same success.<\/p>\n<p>Of the 20 major manufacturing categories in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/ces\/\">latest Bureau of Labor Statistics data<\/a>, only six have grown faster during the trade war \u2013 which arguably began with the threat of widespread tariff increases in April of 2018 \u2013 than in previous years. The rest, which include chemicals, paper and textiles, either didn\u2019t enjoy a boost or lost ground during the period.<\/p>\n<p>And here is one lesson from the trade war. If Trump and his supporters want to claim that tariffs helped accelerate job creation in machinery and metals, then it follows that his policies should share some of the blame for the less encouraging performance of other sectors hurt by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cmtradelaw.com\/category\/china-retaliatory-tariffs\/\">retaliation from other countries<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>After Trump extended steel tariffs to the European Union, the <a href=\"http:\/\/trade.ec.europa.eu\/doclib\/docs\/2018\/may\/tradoc_156909.pdf\">EU<\/a> hit America\u2019s textiles industry. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fin.gc.ca\/access\/tt-it\/cacsap-cmpcaa-1-eng.asp\">Canada<\/a> targeted some paper products in retaliation for tariffs on steel and <a href=\"https:\/\/globalnews.ca\/news\/4293847\/tariffs-lumber-pricing-americans-out-of-housing-market-trump\/\">softwood lumber<\/a>. And China, Trump\u2019s primary antagonist, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crowell.com\/files\/20180803-China-301-Retaliation-List-25-Percent-Tariffs-Unofficial.pdf\">hit chemicals<\/a> along with a large swath of other industries \u2013 with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/business-48253002\">further retaliation<\/a> on the way.<\/p>\n<h2>Beyond jobs<\/h2>\n<p>Nonetheless, the simple fact remains: The U.S. economy continues to add more jobs.<\/p>\n<p>But this is only one part of the equation for how tariffs are affecting working Americans and their quality of life. What about wages, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/opub\/ted\/2016\/wages-and-salaries-for-private-industry-workers-increase-2-point-6-percent-over-the-year-ended-june-2016.htm\">account for 70%<\/a> of an employee\u2019s average compensation?<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s less good news for Trump in this data.<\/p>\n<p>The annual growth in seasonally adjusted hourly pay during the trade war averages out to <a href=\"https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/CES0500000003\">around 3.2%<\/a> across all private sector U.S. employees.<\/p>\n<p>There are two important things to say about that 3.2%. First, it falls short of pre-Great Recession levels, when wage growth was typically <a href=\"https:\/\/www.frbatlanta.org\/chcs\/wage-growth-tracker.aspx\">a full point higher<\/a>. Second, wage growth in manufacturing \u2013 the sector Trump has lavished the most attention on \u2013 actually <a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/la-na-trump-manufacturing-wage-growth-lags-20190411-story.html\">lags behind<\/a> the national average at just 2.3%.<\/p>\n<p>Those wage numbers are good reason to hold our applause for Trump\u2019s tariffs. Protected industries are adding jobs, but wages aren\u2019t living up to expectations.<\/p>\n<h2>Looking for good news<\/h2>\n<p>The competing job numbers explain why the debate over Trump\u2019s tariffs are full of confusing anecdotes \u2013 and why most anyone can find \u201cgood news\u201d to support their favorite argument.<\/p>\n<p>Americans have heard United Steel Workers <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apnews.com\/05b90ea409da42ab9534ce40ed9ffa48\">thank Trump<\/a> for helping bring <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2019\/02\/12\/business\/us-steel-mill\/index.html\">over 1,000 jobs<\/a> back to Birmingham, Alabama. They\u2019ve also heard General Motors announce that it <a href=\"https:\/\/hillreporter.com\/general-motors-is-preparing-to-lose-a-massive-1-billion-over-trumps-tariffs-4416\">lost US$1 billion<\/a> in 2018, partly because tariffs contributed to rising production costs, and that as many as <a href=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/2018\/11\/26\/after-losing-1-billion-to-tariffs-genera\/\">14,000 jobs are being cut<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A fuller picture of how well workers are doing requires looking beyond the jobs numbers at how much money they\u2019re actually taking home \u2013 and how it\u2019s affecting their living standards.<\/p>\n<p>And none of this says anything about another crucial part of the equation: consumer prices. If the latest data from Goldman Sachs is on the money, things are about to get a whole lot worse for working-class Americans as the price tags attached to products affected by the trade war <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2019\/05\/13\/this-chart-from-goldman-sachs-shows-tariffs-are-raising-prices-for-consumers-and-it-could-get-worse.html\">begin to rocket upward<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>This is hardly good news for the average household.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;\" src=\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/117159\/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic\" alt=\"The Conversation\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: http:\/\/theconversation.com\/republishing-guidelines --><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/jeffrey-kucik-279724\">Jeffrey Kucik<\/a>, Assistant Professor of Political Science, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/university-of-arizona-959\">University of Arizona<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>This article is republished from <a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\">The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/is-trumps-trade-war-saving-american-jobs-or-killing-them-117159\">original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jeffrey Kucik | May 15, 2015 With the U.S.-China trade war intensifying, there is a lot of talk about whether tariffs save American jobs \u2013 as President Donald Trump claims \u2013 or destroy them. On May 14, for example, Trump said his tariffs helped save the U.S. steel industry. Whether or not that\u2019s true, many\u2026 <span class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/2019\/05\/15\/is-trumps-trade-war-saving-american-jobs-or-killing-them\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2145,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[9,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2143"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2143"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2143\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2146,"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2143\/revisions\/2146"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2145"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.adamsmithnow.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}